This
course has introduced me to a new world of research! My district had actually implemented a
‘strategic plan’ a few years back, but in the middle of implementation our
Superintendent retired and the direction of the plan fell apart. After learning
more about action research, I realize the leaders were trying to implement
action research. I believe it would have been much better received with a bit
more background and buy-in to the process, or with some understanding such as
what we have learned in this course.
In
the first week of this course, we used Blogger to create our own blogs. This
was a new format of social media or communication for me. I have developed a Weebly and worked with
Wikis, but using Blogger has been a whole new experience, and sometimes a
challenge, for me. I plan to continue building knowledge in blogging through
more practice and searching the Internet for tips. I believe I will gain a better understanding
as I work through it. I will also reach out to a co-work who loves to blog. She
will be an outstanding resource for me.
The
video interviews of educational leaders also helped me develop a better
understanding of action research. The explanation Dr. Chargois gave for various
ideas of research made me realize it can happen at a campus level, or come from
an outside source.
The
Dana text, Leading with Passion and Knowledge, was a very helpful
resource for me. Chapter two gave explanations and examples of the nine areas
of major wonderings, which pushed me to start thinking of examples from my
campus that would fit into these categories. It seemed that several areas that
came to mind addressed the need to improve student achievement. This led to my
initial idea for action research.
The
action research planning models eased a lot of my tension. When I developed my
question, I felt lost and wasn’t sure how to work through the process, but the
SIP/PIP Plan and Tool 7.1 Template helped me develop a very workable outline
plan for my research. This helped me
feel much more confident in what I was preparing.
I
would like to learn more about the procedures for quality literature review. I
will discuss this further with my site supervisor and also research more
articles similar to the one we read in our first week to gain insight into this
topic.
I
had never heard of Force Field Analysis, the Delphi Method, or Nominal Group
Technique. It was fairly clear for me to understand how Force Field and Delphi
Method could benefit a researcher. It took a little more for me to understand
the process of the Nominal Group Technique. After first reading about it, I had
a negative perception of this technique, but as I thought more about
implementation, I felt it would actually be a great way to develop and increase
staff buy-in.
I
was very nervous about taking this course initially, but it has actually been a
very engaging and informative class that helped me build more confidence in
myself as a leader and an educational researcher.